Saturday, July 18, 2009

George Miller votes to ban States from enacting single-payer health care

Dear Rep. Miller,
Why did you vote NO on the Kucinich amendment to the Health Care Reform bill, an amendment that would allow the states to enact single-payer health care systems? (Thank goodness it passed the Ed & Labor Committee vote, in spite of your opposition.)

You claim that you fully support a "public option". Isn't single-payer a public option? Single-payer would eliminate the insurance company middle man, control costs, and ensure universal coverage. The so-called public option in the current version of the bill would not be nearly as effective as a single-payer system.

If you support the concept of universal affordable public health care, but can't get enough votes in the House to pass a single-payer system, why in the world would you block the States from enacting it?!


As this bill works its way through congress, there will be many working behind the scenes trying to strip this amendment out of the final bill. Please don't be one of them!
____________________________________________

House Lets States do Single-Payer
by David Swanson , July 17, 2009
http://www.opednews.com/

On Friday morning at 9:45 a.m. ET in the House Committee on Education and Labor, the committee members voted 25 to 19 to pass Congressman Dennis Kucinich's amendment to the healthcare reform bill. This amendment, if it survives the full House, the Senate, the conference, and the President, will not alter the federal legislation except to allow states to create single-payer healthcare systems if they choose to. ....

READ Full Article and see ROLL CALL VOTE
_________________________________________

A Real Win for Single-Payer Advocates
by John Nichols, July 17, 2009
http://www.thenation.com/

Canada did not establish its national health care program with a bold, immediate political move by the federal government.

The initial progress came at the provincial level, led by the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation's Tommy Douglas when he served from 1941 to 1960 premier of Saskatchewan. The universal, publicly-funded "single-payer" health care system that Douglas and his socialist allies developed in Saskatchewan proved to be so successful and so popular that it was eventually adopted by other provinces and, ultimately, by Canada's federal government.

... Votes for the amendment came from progressive Democrats who favor single-payer -- such as Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chairs Lynn Woolsey, of California, and Raul Grijalva, of Arizona -- as well as conservative Republicans who have no taste for single-payer but want states to be able to set their own agendas.

Opposition to the amendment came mainly from Democrats such as committee chair George Miller, of California, who have resisted moves to create more flexible, innovation-friendly legislation.

.... After the committee vote, Rose Ann DeMoro, the executive director of the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee, said, "This is a historic moment for patients, for American families, and for the tens of thousands of nurses and other single-payer activists from coast to coast who can now work in state capitols to pass single-payer bills, the strongest, most effective solution of all to our healthcare crisis."

READ Full Article
_________________________

For an overview of the current health care reform bill being discussed and formulated in congress, and its prospects for genuine reform, see article, "Obama's Health Plan, far from transformation".

For better understanding of single-payer system, see website of Physisians for a National Health Program http://www.pnhp.org/

1 comment:

  1. I agree with your concerns about Rep. George Miller's failure to back a single-payer health care system before the very committee that he chairs. Congressman Miller needs to explain to his constituents and to the American people why he is against the single payer system. Is he really the "progressive" that people blindly think that he is? After 34+ years in Congress, he is taking his constituents' votes for granted. His political protege, Mark DeSaulnier, is now running for Congress in CD10. Mr. DeSaulnier is running on a "health care" platform in which he repeatedly professes his support for not only the single payer system, but also for his mentor and friend Rep. Miller. DeSaulnier claims that he will follow Miller's lead on most issues, especially health care policy, if he is elected to Congress. If Miller is opposed to single-payer, then we can expect that a Congressman DeSaulnier also will be opposed when it comes up for a vote. Campaign promises are just hollow rhetoric if they aren't followed up where it counts -- votes in congressional committees and on the floor of Congress. Please continue in your quest to get Rep. Miller to offer a public explanation as to why he opposed single-payer in his NO vote on the Kucinich amendment before his committee in July 2009.

    ReplyDelete